Guys, looking at the 2v2 ladder, you need to get your teams challenging. The activity is pathetic, and I am going to start to remove inactive teams. I'm not sure how long this ladder will remain with such low levels of activity.
um, someone has way too high expectations for a Tribes based ladder. I dont think there are popular wc3 ladders, other than the bnet one, cuz the bnet ladder itself is pretty good. Post edited by Britney Speared at 1/15/2003 10:26:55 PM
You'd be amazed. Counterstrike, I believe, is our largest ladder, followed by T2 or AA, then BF1942/T1. So we're not really Tribes based as most would assume, it's just the community rotates around us.
The expectation comes from the "bosses" who regularly check to see how active all ladders are, dropping those that lose activity.
Dude listen to what Enmity just said. 2v2 is in danger of going bye-bye and you're asking who's gonna challenge you? o_O mkay homie. -------------------------
MASS losses
nah it's just that TWL is based around FPS team games like CS and teh T2. So when wc3 came around, no one really wanted to play it cuz they're all caught up in their T2 egos. egos? Waffles yes mmmm ...no that's eggos...er...something along those lines rawr -------------------------
MASS losses
Eggos are good. But video games are better. And word is that Tribes is working on something new. Not exactly called Tribes 3 and this is not a rumor, but something new tribes-style is coming. TWL go apeshit.